There are other options for possible metaphors that move us away from the owner’s manual for life (OMFL) approach to the bible. The bible as classic, inspired classic, is one option but what about reading the bible the way we would read a jazz score?
The OMFL approach has us combing the text for whatever we think might apply in our lives right here right now. The problem is over time what applies right here right now, doesn’t apply 50 years later right here right now. We have found that model desperately wanting.
But a jazz score? Ahhhh….here is a metaphor with some traction. In jazz you immerse yourself in the score of the composer. You need to know that score inside and out. Why? Because there is going to come a time during the performance where you as the trombonist get to improvise. And your improvisation must be in continuity with the score. A couple things are very important here. Improvisation builds on the score. It isn’t a repetition of the notes on the page, but it is in continuity with the score. In other words the improvisation ought to smell of the original score but have it’s own contribution in how it echoes it.
[read more...]
Share on Facebook
The classic is one new metaphor we can consider as we are looking for a way forward from the owner’s manual for life (OMFL) approach which seems to be boil the narrative down to stories encasing propositions we have to figure out how to mine.
David Tracy was one theologian who realized the problem we were having in our reading the biblical text. His proposal in 1981 in his winsome though dense volume, The Analogical Imagination, was that we might want to consider reading the text as a classic.
Now for those of you reading this from a more conservative perspective don’t panic. Classic doesn’t imply “not real” or even ‘not inspired’ for that matter. In fact let’s call it an inspired classic (some actually find that a redundant couplet…all classics are inspired some would say). We have to consider new paradigms with an open mind or we never really “hear” their power.
[read more...]
Share on Facebook
We need some new metaphors. I think it is quite clear the two bucket theory is untenable, and the owners manual for life metaphor reduces the bible to a behavior manual. Both the theory and metaphor generate so many problems that it is time we start searching for an alternative approach to the text.
This is always how paradigm shifts occur. When a paradigm is initially adopted it answers a variety of questions very well. Those adopting the paradigm realize it doesn’t answer all questions and those unanswerables go on a shelf for further reflection and research. No paradigm is perfect, no model can answer all the questions.
Eventually the current paradigm, always historically and contextually rooted, answers fewer and fewer questions well and the shelf with the unanswerables becomes overloaded and near collapse. This is when a new paradigm begins to emerge. We are undoubtedly living in such a new paradigm time.
[read more...]
Share on Facebook
So we have the bucket theory, which really sits as the backbone to the owner’s manual for life approach to scripture; something we already said we have to get rid of. The bucket theory has been asking this question for decades “what is in the eternal and relevant bucket and what is the in the cultural and irrelevant bucket?” While most people and/or pastors would never articulate this as their approach, a bit of probing reveals that for most this is hoe they figure out how to live, what to obey and what the rules of engagement are. This is how we end up using the text as “an owner’s manual for life. Two big problems, intractable, impossible-to-get-around problems arise with this question.
[read more...]
Share on Facebook
We pick and choose at will….what we apply from the bible that is. If our controlling metaphor for the text of scripture is too modern then so is our approach. I ended our last post in this thread asking, “can I just apply Joshua 1:6-9 to my life as if the text is written to me?” The owner’s manual metaphor approach will give a resounding yes. But the question has to be asked why? Why do we think something written to a guy somewhere around 3500 years ago would have any application directly to me?
I see people do this same direct application thing with passages from Jeremiah 1 to the book of Jonah, from words to the disciples, to early church practices. And when asked why we assume this one to one correspondence between the life of the biblical character and my life is appropriate, one response seems to get pride of place. The bible is the inspired word of God and is profitable…(II Timothy 3.16-17)
[read more...]
Share on Facebook
